Avoid a claw back by delivering the Choice in Child Care Allowance through
the Child Tax Benefit
March 13, 2006
By Dennis Howlett, Executive Director, National Anti-Poverty Organization
There is a danger the Conservative ’s Choice in Child Care Allowance
could be clawed-back by some provincial governments from some of the poorest
families, namely those receiving social assistance.
As a recent commentary paper by Ken Battle from the Caledon
Institute of Social Policy, The Choice in Child Care Allowance:
What You See is Not What You Get, explains unless there are specific
exemptions negotiated with the provinces, these payments would most likely
be treated as income. Social assistance benefits could be reduced
by the equivalent amount. The poorest families and children
would then get absolutely no benefit from this program.
If the intent of this allowance is to recognize the additional costs families
incur when they have young children and provide some social support to
help them with these expenses then the Conservative government needs to
ensure that this payment will be available to all families, especially
the poorest.
The best way to deliver this allowance, in our view, would be through
the existing Child Tax Benefit. The Child Tax Benefit (the base amount)
is a non-taxable benefit that is already exempt from being counted as
income by provincial welfare programs and therefore not subject to claw-back
from social assistance recipients.
There is still a problem with many provinces clawing back the National
Child Benefit Supplement, the additional benefit available for low-income
families, but that is another issue.
If the government chooses to target an additional benefit to
families with children under 6, rather than to all children up to age
18, or make this additional benefit universal (available to all families
regardless of how high the income) they can still do so for this
additional amount with minor adjustments to the Child Tax Benefit system.
The Child Tax Benefit is a proven program that has helped to reduce the
extent and depth of child poverty and it would be great to improve it.
Any increase in benefits would be welcome, even if it doesn't come up
to the $4900 per child that the National Anti-Poverty Organization, Campaign
2000 and the Make Poverty History campaign have called for as a key part
of a plan to end child poverty in Canada.
There are significant efficiency arguments in favour of delivering the
Choice in Child Care Allowance in this way as well. The Child Tax Benefit
system is already set up with over 90% of families with children registered
and it is already delivering monthly cheques. Setting up a whole new program
and sending out two separate cheques each month to families with children
would be a wasteful use of resources.
NAPO believes that the Choice in Child Care Allowance does not replace
the need for continued daycare funding. We believe the early learning
and childcare agreements negotiated with provincial governments should
be honoured. The lack of quality day care spaces in many communities is
a major barrier, especially for poor single parents, to getting work that
could help them escape poverty. It should be possible to both provide
additional support to families with young children and support the development
of a national early learning and child care program.
|