News/Commentary
Headlines:
Moving
Forward: Alternative Federal Budget puts the surplus to work April
28, 2006
NAPO
welcomes challenge on constitutional right to civil legal aid
June 20, 2005
Don't Ignore UN Committee Recommendations
on Human Rights, Canadian NGOs say
May 22, 2006
The Canadian government cannot ignore the recommendations of the UN
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, a network of Canadian
non-governmental organizations, said.
The UN human rights body released its Concluding Observations on its
review of Canada ’s record in implementing the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, one of the key United Nations
human rights treaties it has signed.
The Committee found that despite Canada ’s economic prosperity, 11.2
percent of its population still lived in poverty in 2004. The Committee
expressed particular concern that poverty rates remain very high among
disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups such as Aboriginal
peoples, African-Canadians, immigrants, persons with disabilities, youth,
women and single mothers. The Committee noted with concern that in most
provinces and territories, social assistance rates are lower now than
a decade ago.
The Committee recommended Canada “fully abide by its obligations” under
the Covenant and “take all possible measures to the maximum of its available
resources to ensure the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights
for all.” In particular it recommended that Canada establish social assistance
at levels which ensure the realization of an adequate standard of living,
ensure minimum wages are increased throughout Canada , ensure access to
employment insurance benefits, and address the issue of food insecurity
and hunger, homelessness and inadequate housing as a national emergency.
The Committee also expressed a number of particular concerns about ways
in which the rights of First Nations and Aboriginal peoples are being
violated and called on Canada to re-examine its policies and practices
towards the inherent rights and titles of Aboriginal peoples. It also
recommended the resumption of negotiations with the Lubicon Lake Band
in Alberta .
The Committee was critical of Canadian governments for treating
rights such as the right to adequate social assistance or the right to
adequate healthcare as "principles and programmatic objectives rather
than legal obligations". It drew attention to the "lack
of effective enforcement mechanisms for these rights" and "the
practice of governments to urge upon their courts an interpretation of
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms denying protection of Covenant
rights." The Committee identified the controversial
decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on healthcare in the Chaoulli
case for concern, The decision has been widely criticized for undermining
the universal right to adequate healthcare in Canada regardless of ability
to pay.
“As a new member of the UN Human Rights Council, Canada needs to improve
its own human rights record before it can criticize the human rights record
of other countries with any integrity,” the NGO network said. When seeking
a seat on the new Human Rights Council , Canada had pledged to “give serious
consideration to the recommendations of UN treaty bodies.” Yet the Committee
noted that, “most of its 1993 and 1998 recommendations have not been implemented,”
and strongly reiterated its call for more effective follow-up to the recommendations
in this report.
The network of Canadian non-governmental organizations are calling on
the parliamentary Standing Committees on Human Resources and Social Development
and the Justice and Human Rights Committee to review the Concluding Observations
and get answers from the government on how they plan to implement the
recommendations of this UN Committee.
The full text of Concluding Observations from the UN Committee on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights can be found on the UN High Commission for
Human Rights web site at: http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/docs/E.C.12.CAN.CO.5.pdf
On November 24, 1989, Canada’s House of Commons unanimously passed a
resolution stating that: “This House seeks to achieve the goal of eliminating
poverty among Canadian children by the year 2000.”
More than fifteen years later, and five years after the deadline of
2000, what has happened?
- One in six Canadian children is poor.
- Canada’s child poverty rate of 15 percent is three times as high
as the rates of Sweden, Norway or Finland.
- Every month, 770,000 people in Canada use food banks. Forty percent
of those relying on food banks are children.
These statistics point to a betrayal of Canada’s children. What makes
the persistence of child poverty all the more disturbing is that Canada
is a rich country, a country that ranked fourth in the world on the 2004
UN Human Development Index.
But in the midst of wealth, almost 5 million Canadians live in poverty.
Poverty is increasing for youth, workers, young families and
immigrant and visible minority groups. Poverty among Aboriginal groups
remains appallingly high both on and off reserve. In fact, if the statistics
for Canadian Aboriginal people were viewed separately from those of the
rest of the country, Canada’s Aboriginal people would slip to 78 th on
the UN Human Development Index – the ranking currently held by Kazakhstan.
Canada needs to support the achievement of the Millennium Development
Goals for poverty reduction globally, but if we are to have any integrity
we also need to work at achieving poverty reduction goals at home. The
national platform of the Make Poverty History campaign in Canada puts
forward achievable demands that would make a significant contribution
to “making poverty history” – globally and in Canada.
What needs to be done
We can achieve the elimination of child poverty in Canada within five
years if we:
1) expand affordable housing;
2) build a universally accessible child care system;
3) raise minimum wages and increase the availability of good jobs at
living wages; and
4) increase the Child Tax Benefit to $4,900 per child, per year and
ensure that all low-income children receive the full benefit of this program.
More...
Tax cuts
"for the poor" could end up going mostly to the rich warns NAPO
November 17, 2004
“Tax cuts being considered supposedly to help the poor could end up
going mostly to middle and upper income families, ” warned Dennis Howlett,
Executive Director of the National Anti-Poverty Organization in an appearance
before the Parliamentary Finance Committee on November 17, 2004.
NAPO tabled a paper prepared for them by Andrew Mitchell and Richard
Shillington, which shows that increasing the personal credit to $12,000
would result in only 3.5% of the share of the benefit going to low-income
families. The paper also shows that when provincial taxes are also included,
the poorest people are paying 35% of their income in taxes, the same rate
as those with incomes over $100,000 are paying. This is largely because
the poor pay more as a percentage of their income in GST and provincial
sales taxes than the rich.
“Canada no longer has a progressive tax system.” Howlett claimed. “But
some of the tax cut options being considered would do little to make it
more progressive,” he warned. “The best way to deliver tax cuts for poor
families is through changes to the GST, either restoring the real value
of the GST credit for low-income families and improving on it or through
reducing the GST rate,” NAPO told the Committee.
“Debt reduction and tax cuts which have been the focus of the last several
budgets have succeeded in increasing the rate and depth of poverty,” said
NAPO President, Robert Arnold. He said it is time that priority be given
to the needs of poor Canadians. NAPO called for increased spending on
social housing, raising the Child Tax Benefit to $4900 a year per child
and implementation of a national childcare program.
For more information see:
NAPO Discussion Discussion Paper: Federal
relief for low income people
NAPO Submission to the Standing Committee
on Finance, Pre-Budget Consultations, Nov. 2004
by Dennis Howlett, NAPO Executive Director
The election of a minority Liberal government creates some new opportunities
for action on poverty issues in Canada. And NAPO will be working hard
with other anti-poverty groups to ensure promises made during the election
campaign become reality.
Social housing is one issue where we can expect some progress. The Liberals
promised an additional $1.5 billion for social housing and both the NDP
and Bloc called for $2 billion to build 30,000 social housing units a
year. There should be sufficient agreement among these parties for some
concrete action to take place. Indeed, it is a hopeful sign that Prime
Minister Martin has appointed Joe Fontana as Minister for Labour and Housing.
This is the first time in a long time that housing related issues have
received full ministry status, and Mr. Fontana has some background on
housing issues having co-authored, with Paul Martin, a report on housing
for the Liberal party. More...
Time for Governments
to Raise Social Assistance Rates and End Punitive Regulations July
9, 2004
It's time governments across the country raised welfare rates so people
can get out and stay out of poverty, says the National Anti-Poverty Organization
in response to the release of the National Council of Welfare Report entitled
Welfare Incomes 2003. This recently released report showed that welfare
rates continue to be well below what is required to obtain even basic
necessities like food and shelter.
"This report lets politicians know just how bad things are for those
who are trying to live on social assistance," says Robert Arnold, President
of NAPO. "It shows that current social assistance rates help keep people
in poverty. They don't help them overcome it."
While the extent of poverty has not changed a great deal, the depth of
poverty has grown dramatically with social assistance rates in many provinces
set at less than half the poverty line.
Over the last 10 years, provinces and territories have cut social assistance
rates and introduced punitive regulations that have limited people's ability
to find work and affordable housing, pay bills and purchase basic necessities.
In 1996, the Ontario Conservatives under Mike Harris cut provincial rates
by 21.6% and more recently (in 2002) British Columbia eliminated all earnings
exemptions for people receiving assistance and placed time limits on how
long a person can receive benefits.
"These restrictions and practices are not acceptable. It's time for governments
to address the facts about poverty and low benefits, and start raising
rates," says Arnold. "They have an obligation and a responsibility to
take immediate action on this issue."
Ontario recently raised assistance benefits by 3% but this only adds
$15 to a cheque for a single person receiving $520. The increase still
leaves families and single people well below the poverty line. It was
the first increase in Ontario rates in 11 years.
The National Anti-Poverty Organization is a non-profit group representing
people in poverty.
|